Tag: self-improvement

SUCCESS

Creating a different and better self is as Neal Armstong noted “…one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.”

Books of Interest
 Website: chetyarbrough.blog

Atomic Habits (Tiny Changes, Remarkable Results, An Easy and Proven Way to Build Good Habits & Break Bad Ones.)

Author: James Clear

Narrated By: James Clear

James Clear (Author, earned a biomechanics degree from Denison University in 2008.)

James Clear begins his “self-help” book with a baseball accident. He overcomes a serious injury in his high school years caused by a baseball bat that flies out of a teammates’ practice swing that smashes him between the eyes. It crushes his nose and cracks his skull, causing a brain bleed that nearly ends his life. His recovery leads him to a career as a performance coach for athletes and executives.

Quality of life.

“Atomic Habits” is how he turned that accident into several surprisingly simple insights into how one can improve their life. He suggests it is not a self-help book that tells you what to do but to understand who you believe you are. If you think of yourself as an athlete. you choose your sport and develop the tools that make you that athlete. The author chose baseball as his athletic ambition despite his accident. Clear explains he recovered but failed to make the baseball team in his return to high school.

Clear explains his baseball failure in high school is not because of willpower but because he needed more practice to become what he wished to be.

He went to Denison University. It had a team that gave him the environment he needed to further develop the baseball skills he learned in high school. With further practice and this new baseball environment he became part of Denison University’s team. He became a baseball player; not just a baseball player but the team captain and starting pitcher for Denison University in 2005. Clear’s desire to be a baseball athlete, his practicing the tools needed, and being in a baseball environment were keys to his accomplishments.

Clear notes habits are not goals.

The point Clear makes are that habits are not goals, but habits make up a system for accomplishment of who one wishes to be. Accomplishment is a process, not an end. Practice is a process that has plateaus where, at times, it appears one is not making progress, but continued practice will have breakthroughs if one persists. Clear explains the breakthroughs change how one sees the world, who they are, and their place in it.

First, one must choose who they want to be.

Clear suggests one can change their life by choosing who they want to be. If an introvert wants to be an extrovert, then they need to identify themselves as one who connects with others. To connect with others, one can choose to be an extrovert and be curious about another person rather than think of themselves as bad at small talk. Design a system of connection that is natural and not forced. Building small, intentional interactions with others can be built upon to reinforce extroversion.

You are who you choose to be.

Much of what Clear argues is that one has to change their identity, develop appropriate habits to reinforce a chosen identity, use tools that are obvious and easy to use that reinforce who you have chosen to be and celebrating your successes in redefining your identity. Creating a different and better self is as Neal Armstong noted “…one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.”

MEMORY & INTELLIGENCE

Total recall does not make humans more intelligent or necessarily more informed about the world.

Books of Interest
 Website: chetyarbrough.blog

“Moon walking with Einstein: The Art and Science of Remembering Everything“

By: Joshua Foer

Narrated by: Mike Chamberlain

Joshua Foer (Author, freelance journalist, 2006 USA Memory Champion.)

Joshua Foer offers an interesting explanation of human memory. Foer became the 2006 USA memory champion. Foer explains how he achieved that distinction. What is interesting and surprising about Foer’s achievement is that he argues extraordinary memory is a teachable skill.

Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930)

Fans will remember Sir Arthur Conan Doyles’ explanation of Sherlock Homes’ prodigious memory technique called the “mind palace”.

Foer explains the idea is not a fiction but an historically proven method for improving one’s memory through association. “Mind palace” is traced back to ancient Greece as a memory tool of the Greek poet Simonides of Ceos. The idea is to associate facts with familiar features of a house in which one has lived, or of which one has intimate knowledge. The idea of memory being associated with something is not revelatory to anyone who tries to remember someone’s name. Many people, particularly good salespeople, use association to remember a customer’s name. They might remember Fred as a “red” tie or Monica as a “harmonica” and so on.

Foer suggests nothing is forgotten but only stored in one’s mind.

The problem is recalling a mind’s recorded information. If one makes a point of associating a fact with something that is familiar, say like a space in your own house, it is more likely to be recallable. Foer notes experimental studies show human brains record memories of events but may be unable to consciously recall details. In “show and tell” experiments, humans show evidence of a recorded memory by expressing familiarity, if not specificity. (“MIT research explains how our brain helps us remember what we’ve seen, even as visual information shifts around within our visual system.” See MIT NEWS Feb. 8, 2021.)

Foer suggests the history of memory began naturally with tales told and re-told before writing became a way of record keeping.

Foer explains history shows that philosophers like Socrates rejected the idea of recording information as a way of revealing truth. To Socrates, truth comes from conversational exploration of nature as it is. Foer suggests society is fortunate that Plato and Archimedes partly disagreed and chose to provide a written record of Socrates thought.

A larger picture of Foer’s view of memory and recall implies a leveling of knowledge in the world.

From an oral tradition to the written word to radio to television to the internet of things to microchips in one’s brain–the recall of facts become more widely shared. The complication of improving “knowledge leveling” is in how recalled facts are assembled by the brain of the receiver.

Foer illustrates how much effort must be put into memorizing information if one wishes to excel as a technologically unplugged person who wishes to recall more facts. It requires concentrated effort to create a mnemonic device like rooms in a house to associate a series of facts or numbers that can be recalled. On the other hand, advances in technology could make that exercise moot.

In the near future, recollection from an implanted human chip could improve correlation of facts for thought and action.

This is not to diminish the accomplishments of the author in training his mind to recall facts better than others. In the near future, recalling and collating facts may be more efficiently managed by an A.I. microchip that complements human thought and action.

Having eidetic memory or technological total recall does not make humans more intelligent or necessarily more informed about the world. Recall of facts is only a means to an end that may as easily destroy as improve society.