BECOMING god-LIKE

27 thoughts on “BECOMING god-LIKE”

1. Impossible to honor the oath brit which creates the chosen Cohen people יש מאין without remembering the exact Case/Rule oaths they swore to HaShem wherein they cut this brit alliance to forever create the chosen Cohen people יש מאין.
   ___________________________________________

   The Official ArtScroll Blog

   ArtScroll Staff·blog.artscroll.com·10h ago

   EMUNAH: Perhaps Even Double

   Adapted from: Living Emunah 8 by Rabbi David Ashear R’ Aharon Margalit was invited to speak in a shul on the topic of kibbud av va’eim. Part of his talk was about children judging their parents favorably. After the speech, an older couple was waiting to speak to him. The husband, who introduced himself as […]
   _________________________________________

   צדק צדק תרדוף …The repetition of צדק denotes not moral abstraction but procedural justice—pursuit of justice through due process, i.e., courtroom deliberation rooted in precedent and interpretation. The verb “תרדוף” implies active legal pursuit: the work of judges chasing interpretive coherence through live cases.

   The Oral Torah codification of the Sha’s Mishna functions as the key blueprint for judicial lateral common law courtrooms. No common ground exists with assimilated codes of religious ritual laws. Mishnayot rely upon the בניין אב and other 13 middot of Rabbi Yishmael as tools to derive legal architecture from precedent, not Greek & Roman statute legislation. The Middle Ages perversion of the Talmud to a statutory halacha handbook which defines the religion of Orthodox Judaism – simply completely off the דרך.

   The 13 Middot of rabbi Yishmael serve as interpretive tools. In essence the grammar of Jewish common law—tools to derive new rulings from precedent; not tools of exegetical cleverness or mysticism. Rashi as a linguistic exegete, building clarity through p’shat and influenced by the Aruch. His genius – semantic precision, but that does not satisfy the courtroom’s need for structural legal comparison. Rabbeinu Tam, representing the Tosafist shift, sees this as an error: Talmudic discourse isn’t a glossary—it’s a judicial method. Tosafot insist on sugya-correlation and cross-case inference, a reassertion of precedent-based interpretation.

   פרדס – not mysticism, but a layered interpretive logic of comparison, each level designed to extract new meaning through structural parallels, not imposed deductive frameworks. Greek logic deduces from axioms; פרדס derives from existing rulings. This is why sod is not mystical secret but the “deep structure” of legal alignment.

   The Tosafist project—especially Rabbeinu Tam’s critique of Rashi—as a demand to treat the Talmud as an evolving common law tradition, not merely an educational text. Rabbeinu Tam did not merely seek clarity—he sought legal structure. The Tosafists’ hallmark is cross-sugya precedent tracing, reviving the vitality of case-based halacha.

   Rashi as leaning toward lexical accessibility (influenced by the Aruch) explains why Rabbeinu Tam considered his approach incomplete for courtroom jurisprudence. Rashi’s clarity is p’shat; Tosafot demanded case linkage and dialectical rigor.

   Ibn Ezra’s rationalist method, shaped by Greek syllogistic logic, with the inductive פרדס logic of Rabbi Akiva. Your framing of Ibn Ezra as an “assimilated Hellenist” follows Hazal’s critique of Tzeddukim: intellectuals who replaced oral-interpretive dynamism with foreign models of fixed logic and systematic theology.

   The Rambam’s Mishneh Torah, perverted – due to his gross tuma assimilation – the open-ended legalism of the Talmud into a rigid ritualistic code, disconnected from live courtroom precedent. The Rambam’s embrace of universalist monotheism, influenced by Islamic rationalism and Neoplatonic abstraction, led his to construct his 13 rules of faith rather than צדק צדק תרדוף.

   The פרדס methodology (P’shat, Remez, Drash, Sod) not as a mystical toolset, but as a four-level interpretive model grounded in judicial logic—each level refining the ruling through comparison and precedent. This contrasts Greek logic which draws conclusions from abstract universals. This epistemic divergence has civilizational consequences. פרדס preserves legal humility and interpretive pluralism. Syllogism leads to dogmatism, codification, and political repression—traits seen both in Christian canon law and Islamic fiqh.

   Logically, Zionism opposed by Orthodox Judaism, leads toward a national restoration of Talmudic law as constitutional brit, rather than exile-style halachic pietism. This model restores Sanhedrin-style justice, rooted in precedent based lateral common law court system of justice. Justice, understood as the obligation placed squarely upon the shoulders of these Sanhedrin courts to seek fair compensation of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews.

   These three words located in the Book of D’varim define Judicial common law court room justice. משנה תורה, the other Name for the Book of D’varim serves as the foundation for rabbi Yechuda’s Sha’s Mishna. What does this Hebrew verb refer to? Answer Judicial common law courts! Hence the Gemara commentary to the Mishna learns by means of precedents. What term did the Sages of the Mishna refer to “precedents”? Answer: בניני אבות, like as found in the 13 middot of rabbi Yishmael. T’NaCH instructs prophetic mussar “common law(משנה תורה)”. Whereas the Talmud instructs ritual halacha “common law(משנה תורה)”.

   The Baali Tosafot commentary to the Talmud, specifically Rabeinu Tam, דוקא goes off the dof in search of precedents. Why? The chief criticism made against the Rashi commentary on the Talmud, The “Aruch” by Rabbi Nathan ben Yehiel of Rome did influence Rashi’s Talmudic commentary, as Rashi often drew upon earlier sources, including lexicons and dictionaries, to clarify terms and concepts in the Talmud. Rashi’s methodology involved providing clear explanations and definitions of words, which aligns with the approach taken in the “Aruch.” Rashi aimed to make the Talmud accessible to his readers, and the insights from the “Aruch” would have contributed to this goal. Rashi frequently referenced earlier works, including the “Aruch,” to explain Talmudic terms and phrases. This helped him provide a more comprehensive understanding of the text. The “Aruch” provided a foundation for this clarity by offering definitions and explanations of terms.

   Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra, in his commentary on the Chumash employed a different but somewhat parallel methodology. Ibn Ezra placed a strong emphasis on the linguistic aspects of the text, analyzing Hebrew words and their roots. He often provided etymological insights similar to those found in the “Aruch.” Ibn Ezra’s commentary also included philosophical and scientific perspectives, reflecting his broader intellectual interests. He sought to connect the biblical text with contemporary knowledge and thought.

   The 10th-century Islamic discovery and translation of ancient Greek texts, particularly those related to philosophy and logic, indeed had a significant impact on Jewish thinkers of the medieval period, including Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra. However, the influence of these texts on Rashi’s commentary was less pronounced. Ibn Ezra was deeply influenced by the works of Greek philosophers, particularly Aristotle and the Neoplatonists. He integrated their ideas into his commentaries, reflecting a broader intellectual engagement with philosophy and science. His approach often emphasized rationalism and logic, which he applied to biblical interpretation. He sought to reconcile Jewish thought with philosophical concepts, making his work more expansive and reflective of contemporary intellectual currents.

   Ibn Ezra’s focus on language and etymology was also informed by the logical structures found in Greek philosophy, allowing him to analyze biblical texts with a critical and systematic approach. By contrast Rashi’s Chumash commentary shaped by Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic system. The kabbalah of Rashi’s wisdom presented the public face of p’shat scholarship. But the study of p’shat compares to a man who stands upon his two legs. The other leg of Rashi’s p’shat Chumash commentary “drosh”. This paired “other” of Rashi p’shat makes a common law precedent search which utterly dominates and defines Rashi’s Chumash “p’shat”.

   Rashi relied heavily on earlier rabbinic sources and Talmudic discussions, emphasizing the importance of tradition and communal understanding over Ibn Ezra’s assimilation to ancient Greek culture and customs whore-house tumah sh’itta of avoda zarah scholarship.

   The Baali Tosafot, specifically the grand-son of Rashi, Rabbeinu Tam’s main criticism against the Rashi commentary to the Talmud, that Rashi most significantly failed to study the Talmud as a common law legal system. In 1232 the rabbis of Paris imposed a נידוי ban upon the Rambam’s halachic code and Guide to the Perplexed – due to Rambam’s assimilation on par with Ibn Ezra – whose son converted to Islam.

   Ibn Ezra and the Rambam directly compare to the Tzeddukim who instigated the Chanukkah Civil War wherein they along with the Syrian Greeks attempted to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah logic format as explained through the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic sh’itta which explains the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev. This logic format, a four-part inductive reasoning which compares Judicial Case/Ruling opinions with other similar Case/Rule judicial rulings. Herein defines how Talmudic common law understands the language of rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi’s Mishna.

   The Ba’alei Tosafot, including Rabbeinu Tam, critiqued Rashi for not fully engaging with the Talmud as a common law legal system. This critique highlights a tension between Rashi’s focus on clarity and the more complex legal analyses that later scholars sought to develop. The emphasis on common law and legal precedent became a hallmark of Tosafist scholarship.

   This מאי נפקא מינא distinction between פרדס inductive logic vs. foreign Greek syllogism deductive logic, while the latter compares to the satisfaction of a hog eating slop from a trough; the former contrasts Jewish judicial common law from Greek and Roman statute law legalism. Assimilated Jews “converted” the Talmud into codes of religious law divorced from Courtroom judicial rulings. The Rambam called Talmudic common law as too difficult for the Jewish common man to understand. His code perverted judicial law into religious belief system ritualism. Assimilated Rambam openly embraced the Universal God Monotheism theologies promoted by both “daughter religions” which negated that only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai. The “daughter religions” openly repudiated the revelation of a tribal local God at Sinai.

   A sharp example of the perversity of the Rambam embracement of Monotheism and a Universal God, his absurd ruling that the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach applies to all Goyim across the world. Mesechta Sanhedrin introduces the aggadah of the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach as a reference to the distinction gere toshav have over mesechta Baba Kama’s “Nacree” Goy. The latter had no legal rights to sue an Israel for damages. Whereas the ger toshav enjoyed the legal right to sue an Israel for damages. The Rambam halachic perversion of the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach failed to grasp the legal distinction which the Torah itself makes between the gere toshav and the nacree/Canaani in the matter of giving treif flesh to the ger toshav or selling the treif flesh to the nacree/Canaani.

   LikeLike

   Reply

   1. Interesting. Thank you.

      LikeLiked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. CNN attacked by (Israeli) West Bank settlers

         Michael Ruark propaganda
         ________________________________________
         ________________________________________

         CNN — isn’t journalism. It’s theater

         This report reflects the deeply biased, one-sided propaganda that demonizes Israeli civilians and whitewashes terror infrastructure under the guise of journalism. The central tactic here is inversion: the defenders are framed as aggressors. No mention of Hamas-affiliated provocations or organized Palestinian violence that precedes many of these encounters.

         The CNN narrative describes settlers as attacking “in broad daylight” while downplaying the broader context of national security collapse in the West Bank, where Hamas and PIJ cells are actively operating. The emotional framing—”masked settlers,” “clubs,” “burning cars”—evokes lynch mobs, reinforcing ancient antisemitic tropes.

         Michael Ruark promotes CNN Fake News, they cite the death of Saif Musalat, described as a peaceful visitor from Florida—yet provide no evidence that settlers initiated unprovoked violence. The IDF reports a rock ambush, a common trigger for deadly riots and firefights.

         The PA health ministry is used as a primary source—hardly a neutral or credible voice. The Foreign Press Association blames Israel while ignoring the near-daily terror attacks against Jews in the area. Not a word about how “refugee camps” in Jenin and Nablus function as fortified terror bases stocked with explosives, arms, and tunnel networks.

         Quoting WhatsApp rumors, fire footage, and anonymous “witnesses,” the article floats an unsubstantiated claim that “tens of thousands” of Palestinians have been expelled. The IDF has not engaged in expulsions, but in precision operations targeting militants. Civilians are often warned to evacuate before operations to avoid crossfire. The mass displacements are largely self-initiated or pushed by Hamas propaganda encouraging martyrdom narratives. The comparison to genocidal campaigns is a grotesque inversion of fact.

         The article buries a critical fact at the very end: since October 7, over 6,000 terrorists have been arrested and over 950 Palestinians killed, with the IDF stressing the majority were armed combatants or engaged in active violence. These are counterterror operations, not settler pogroms. By blurring the line between militant and civilian, this propaganda sanitizes terror and criminalizes self-defense. The repeated accusations that Israel operates with “impunity” echo the UN’s historically biased anti-Israel stance, ignoring the real impunity enjoyed by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and PFLP fighters in the West Bank.

         This Yellow Journalism bleeding rag trash the essence of structural antisemitism. Jews are framed as violent, conspiratorial mobs attacking innocent Arabs. Jews are framed as violent, conspiratorial mobs attacking innocent Arabs. The implication that Jews are “colonial outsiders” in Judea/Samaria is historical denialism.

         LikeLike

      2. Silos of belief destroy truth in the media as well as in each of us. It is impossible to know who is telling the truth. Always your respectful friend Chet.

         Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

         LikeLiked by 1 person

      3. C.S. Lewis’s “God in the Dock”, published in 1970, does not specifically address the Holocaust (often referred to as the Shoah) or the guilt associated with it in the context of Xtianity. This omission can be seen as a significant gap, especially given the profound moral and theological implications of the Holocaust for both Jewish and Xtian communities. “By their fruits you shall know them” forever condemns Xtianity as a dead religion.

         Philosophical and theological arguments for the existence of God, the nature of faith, and moral reasoning which ignore “By their fruits your shall know them” exposes Xtian religious propaganda rhetoric. “Nature of faith” which ignores צדק צדק תרדוף likewise exposes empty Xtian religious rhetoric propaganda. “Moral reasoning” pales in the “Final Solution”/White Paper\Allied refusal to bomb the rail-lines which transported Jews to death camps. Lewis’s contributions to Xtian apologetics, compares to tits on a boar hog.

         The historical context of the Shoah, by itself alone, challenges the credibility of Xtian teachings such as Luther’s council to gather Jews into their synagogues and burn the buildings upon them. Or the pre-Reformation decision to impose ghetto gulags upon all Jews living in Western Europe. The biblical phrase “צדק צדק תרדוף” (Justice, justice shall you pursue), underscores the expectation that faith should manifest in actions that promote justice and protect the vulnerable. The failure to uphold these principles in the face of systemic evil raises critical questions about the authenticity of faith.

         LikeLike

      4. Interesting.

         Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

         LikeLiked by 1 person

      5. Throughout history, various Christian denominations have contributed to the spread of antisemitic attitudes and actions, creating a climate of hostility toward Jews. This includes theological teachings that portrayed Jews in a negative light and blamed them for the death of Jesus. The Nazi regime, though not the Vatican (the Pope looked on as the Nazis deported the Jews of Rome to death camps), maintained a close alliance with the Lutheran Church in Germany. The Nazis frequently cited Martin Luther’s racist statements about Jews. Christian churches in England and the USA failed to condemn the British White Paper of 1939, and in the United States, not a single Christian denomination opposed Roosevelt’s decision to close U.S. borders to Jewish refugees fleeing from Nazi extermination camps.

         Many argue that the historical role of the Church in fostering antisemitism is of immense significance. The formal apologies, educational initiatives, and interfaith efforts made by Christianity after the Shoah seem like cheap excuses—like teats on a boar: useless and too late. Historical antisemitism within Christianity contributed to the conditions that made the Shoah possible. The Church, as an institution, bears full guilt after over 2,000 years of blood libels, ghettos, and mass expulsions of entire Jewish populations. The words of the Gospel are tragically confirmed: “By their fruits you shall know them.”

         The assignment of criminal guilt, especially in connection with historical events and religious groups, is the subject of this statement. Justice requires naming guilt—and, where necessary, advocating for extreme measures like the death penalty. Throughout history, all Christian denominations have played a role in solidifying antisemitic attitudes and actions, thereby contributing to systemic discrimination and violence against Jewish communities. This includes theological doctrines that justified the kidnapping of Jewish babies through forced baptism and war-crime-level mass expulsions.

         Taxation imposed by the Church without political representation constitutes a form of European enslavement of the Jewish people. Religious Christian organizations must take full responsibility for the actions of their followers and for the ideologies of racial violence they spread. The failure of many Christian churches to denounce antisemitism and to take a stand against the atrocities committed during the Shoah reflects broader complicity in these historical injustices.

         The lack of accountability can perpetuate cycles of hatred and violence—and points to the need for a deeper reckoning with history. It is essential to critique and hold Christianity accountable, both theologically and institutionally. Christian theologies which promote, Love as the greatest commandment, Fire and Brimstone Heaven Hell God Satan bi-polar emotional declarations – all expressions of Av tuma emotional spirits which indoctrinate mental insanity.

         Impossible to not be under the Law and then unilaterally declare which of the multitude of T’NaCH and Talmudic commandments and Halachot qualifies as the most important of all Torah common law. This narishkeit nonsense compares to the 666 mark of the beast and the Church declarations that the Christ killer Jews bear the mark of Cain. Xtianity no different than Nazism. Both promote hate propaganda in the name of Love.

         LikeLike

      6. Disgustingly true!

         Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

         LikeLiked by 1 person

      7. In Jewish thought by stark and absolute total contrast, faith in God not some cult of personality personal or spiritual theological belief system; Torah faith deeply intertwined with ethical prophetic mussar, and social justice. The Torah obligations absolutely require the active pursuit of judicial common law justice through the Sanhedrin courtrooms. Principles of justice and fairness in all dealings, especially in legal matters define the Torah concept of faith.

         The Torah mandates stong emphasis on the appointment of just judges, expected to act with integrity and impartiality. In Deuteronomy 16:18-20, the commandment to appoint judges and officers in all cities underscores the importance of justice: “You shall not pervert justice; you shall not show partiality, and you shall not accept a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and twists the words of the righteous.” This principle, echoed in the teachings of the sages, who stress that a corrupt judiciary undermines the very foundation of society and the time-oriented brit which forever and eternally creates the chosen Cohen people from nothing. Hezekiah’s actions seen as a common law precedent for Sanhedrin justices to pursue justice and righteousness, ensuring that their governance aligns with the values of the Torah through משנה תורה legislative review of all laws and decrees imposed by Government statute laws.

         The presence of bribed judges and corrupt courtrooms leads to the Torah curse of societal decay and a loss of faith among the people; meaning Jews assimilate and embrace the culture and customs of foreign peoples. These aliens reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Horev. When judicial common law justice collapses, it creates a disconnect between the community and HaShem; failure to do and keep tohor time oriented commandments perverts the chosen cohen nation unto just another Av tuma Goyim people. The “converted” non Cohen-people, abandoned or betrayed by leaders equally abandon their faith – the obligation to pursue judicial justice among and between Jews. The prophetic T’NaCH literature often addresses the consequences of injustice, warning that societal ills can lead to divine judgment – Torah curses – like as happened to Par’o in Egypt in the days of Moshe and Aaron. This serves as a reminder that faith most essentially defined, not as Av tumah avoda zara which demand that a Goy believe in this or that theological creed God, but rather Torah faith lives only through pursuit of judicial common law courtroom judgements that promote justice and equity among and between our conflicting peoples.

         This mussar tradition, it emphasizes the cultivation of personal virtues, including integrity, honesty, and a commitment to justice among our people. Prophetic mussar encourages the active pursuit of judicial common law justice to resolve our damages disputes between our people in all generations and all times. These T’NaCH/aggadic and midrashic teachings, they most essentually stress that true loyalty to the Torah brit faith involves far more than personal religious piety, like as promoted by the Shulkan Aruch. But, for more essential, to pursue an active participation in creating a just society, where the rights of all individuals Jews honor and respect and uphold by validating the rulings of the Sanhedrin common law lateral courtrooms.

         The connection between faith in HaShem and the pursuit of justice, the fundamental theme in Torah thought, which most essentially defines the Torah concept of faith. The example of King Hezekiah, as Moshiach revolves around the rebuke of the prophet Natan to the house of David following the death of the baal of Bat Sheva. The Torah curse of Civil War to plague all generations of the House of David, over his profaning the oath dedication of Moshiach in the matter of the killed husband of Bat Sheva. Loyalty to the Torah Constitution most essentially manifests itself in ethical mussar behavior which remembers the rebuke that the prophet Natan cursed the House of David, specifically in the realm of justice over the criminal death of the baal of Bat Sheva. The integrity of the judicial system, which failed to hold king David to stand trial. Later the Talmud would acquit king David of murder. However, this Talmudic opinion does not change the fact that David, and his son Shlomo failed to establish the authority of the Sanhedrin Federal court system as the definition of building the Temple on Zion.

         LikeLike

      8. This makes me better understand Jewish faith and wish I had been raised differently. Thank you.

         Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

         LikeLiked by 1 person

      9. Protestant “dogmatism” redresses Catholic “dogmatism”. Both tits on a boar hog useless.

         C.S. Lewis’s “The Great Divorce” – a narrative that presents a fictional journey from a gray, dreary town (representing Hell through this metaphor) to a vibrant, beautiful heaven, where the characters confront their own choices and the nature of their desires. On par with the Aslan lion metaphor which depicts the Easter resurrection from the dead story.

         The “Great Divorce” theme focuses upon pride. Many of the characters in this metaphor cling to their “sins”. A guilt trip that dates back to the apostle Pauls’ “Original Sin” narishkeit. A lot of Goyim reject the NT guilt trip ideology. The entire Xtian theology of Heaven and Hell, pie in the sky religious theological speculations. The Talmud teaches a person who speculates on matters which the Human mind cannot conceive or grasp … better that such persons’ never born.

         To make literal declarations like “All in hell want to be there”, simply perverting a children story as depicting actual reality – what complete and utter nonsense! The theological creed Xtian belief systems qualify as examples of the metaphor story of residents of hell who made conscious choices that reflect their fervent beliefs in some pie in the sky Nicene theology of the Trinity.

         Torah has no concept of “Free Will” as Calvin solemnly declared. John Calvin’s “dogma” of Free Will emphasizes the sovereignty of some undefined god. His theology promotes the notion that this undefined Universal god has predetermined who will be saved and who will be damned. This perverse dogmatism defines the key component of Reformed Protestant theology.

         However, Calvin did acknowledge the concept of human responsibility and moral choice within the framework of his Universal god’s sovereignty. Mighty White of him to grant his Universal god these powers; such as grace – essential for salvation.

         Interesting – Moshe’s Torah and the Oral Torah-Talmud defines the middah of grace as the dedication – through swearing a Torah oath – of some unspecified tohor middah, as the k’vanna of the tohor midda of Grace. For example the tohor middah of mercy which learns from the commandment to obliterate every man woman and child of Canaan, or to the commandment to slaughter the youth – stubborn and rebellious son, or the commandment to make eternal war upon the assimilated mix multitude of Jews who lack fear of Elohim, known as Amalek. Commonly known today as antisemitism etc. Clearly Calvin’s Protestant dogmatism, like Catholic dogmatism, upon this foundation stands the theology espoused by C.S. Lewis likewise rejects Oral Torah common law precedents, some of which – listed above, as the means to interpret the k’vanna of both tohor middot of grace and mercy!

         LikeLike

      10. When I was in the military, I served in a Crete hospital as a medical. A Greek woman who worked with me gave me the saying in Greek that means “I know something that I know nothing”. I remind myself of that every day. 🙂

          Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

          LikeLiked by 1 person

      11. The bankrupt 35 Trillion dollar national debt Federal Government took post Civil War to present Federal corruption to currently threaten America with its 2nd Civil War.

          OKC bombing redux

          In the past I’ve written about it ad nauseam — the Oklahoma City bombing on April 19, 1995. Then, two nights ago, there it was again in a series of three hour-long episodes
          _________________________________
          _________________________________

          Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols their motivations were deeply rooted in their opposition to government actions, particularly the Waco siege in 1993, where the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) attempted to execute a search warrant at the Branch Davidian compound, leading to a standoff that resulted in the deaths of 76 individuals. Additionally, the Ruby Ridge incident in 1992, which involved a confrontation between federal agents and the Weaver family, further fueled their anti-government sentiments. McVeigh and Nichols meticulously planned the bombing, believing that it would send a strong message against what they perceived as government overreach and tyranny.

          On April 19, 1995, McVeigh parked a rented Ryder truck filled with explosives outside the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. The explosion, which occurred at 9:02 AM, caused widespread destruction and resulted in significant loss of life. The bombing resulted in the deaths of 168 people, including 19 children, and injured over 600 others. It caused significant destruction to the surrounding area and damaged or destroyed several nearby buildings.

          The Waco siege and the Ruby Ridge incident were two significant events in the 1990s that involved confrontations between federal law enforcement and individuals or groups that were perceived as threats to public safety or law and order. Both incidents raised serious questions about the use of government authority and the actions taken by federal agents. The Waco siege involved the Branch Davidian religious sect, led by David Koresh, who was suspected of stockpiling illegal weapons. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) attempted to execute a search warrant on February 28, 1993, which led to a gunfight and the deaths of four ATF agents and six Branch Davidians.

          The federal government, under President Bill Clinton, justified the siege as a necessary action to enforce laws regarding illegal weapons and to protect public safety. The FBI took over the operation, which lasted for 51 days, culminating in a final assault on April 19, 1993, that resulted in a fire that consumed the compound, killing 76 individuals, including many women and children. The handling of the siege was widely criticized for its aggressive tactics and the loss of life. GOP opposition critics of President Clinton accused his leadership of complete, utter and criminal incompetence. Clinton apparently to busy forcing young women to give him a blow job. The GOP opposition condemned the Clinton government for grossly overstepped its authority and its utter and complete incompetence to negotiate effectively. The impeachment of Clinton served as a Parliamentary vote of No Confidence in the Government!

          The Ruby Ridge incident involved Randy Weaver, who was wanted for failing to appear in court on a firearms charge. A standoff occurred between Weaver’s family and federal agents, including the U.S. Marshals and the FBI, which escalated into violence, resulting in the deaths of Weaver’s wife, Vicki, and his son, Samuel. The federal government, under President George H.W. Bush, guilty of State War-crimes in his illegal invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and strongly suspected of justifying this imperialist nation building through the 9/11 inside job attack which resembles something like the Dec 7th Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

          But Cheney/Bush in their absolute and insane criminal arrogance did not approach Congress and ask for a Congressional Declaration of War. Instead these corrupt opportunistic war criminals passed their vile Patriot Act which negated the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution. Similar to Waco, the actions taken at Ruby Ridge were criticized for being excessive and poorly managed, leading to unnecessary loss of life.

          In both cases, there was significant public outcry and criticism of the government’s actions, but very few individuals faced legal consequences. Federal bureaucraps almost Universally operate without any accountability for their actions or regulatory laws they illegally impose upon the American people. This illegal forth branch of the US Government shares an incestuous relationship with Federally established Corporate monopolies. The latter has a revolving door incest/taboo relationship with Federal homo-bureaucraps.

          This illegal 4th Branch of the post Civil War Washington over-reach Government negates the Commerce Clause which relegates intra-state autonomy to the Legislatures of the States of the Union to bureaucratically regulate all intra-state trade & commerce, independent and free from Big Brother Federal carpet-bagger pervert bureaucraps overwatch. Post Civil War the Lincoln GOP dismantled the States authority to appoint Federal Senators to Congress through a Constitutional Amendment.

          The damned Yankees despise States Rights in favor of mob rule democracy. Hence Federal agents often operate under legal fiction protections that shield them from prosecution – when they act in the name of the State! This perversion of the Constitution set the stage wherein the incest revolving door Bureaucrap-Government established (Socialist) Corporate Monopolies function as a concealed Government which pulls the strings of the elected puppets of the 3 Branches of the Federal Government. Herein explains why it cost over a billion dollars to elect a US President to Office. The State established Federal corporate monopolies shape and determine the outcome of all “democratic” elections. These “elections” do not employ paper ballots!

          Investigations into the actions of federal agents invarably conclude that the use of bureaucrapic force – completely justified. Leading to a mafia like shielding – lack of criminal charges of politicians and bureaucraps; Obama can spy on candidate Trump with a fraud hoax Russia-Gate/Water-Gate, with complete and total impunity or risk. The Federal Government plays by a completely different set of rules than those imposed upon the peasant citizens\serf populations. Federal employees enjoy far more benefits than the bread crumbs thrown to the mob masses; the bankrupt social security by which the Federal government taxes the people does not apply to Federal employees and Congress personnel. The decision not to pursue charges against government officials based upon this illegal two-tiered corrupt legal system the direct result of the Lincoln rejection of Jeffersonian Democracy.

          The Oklahoma City bombing occurred on April 19, 1995, and was one of the deadliest acts of domestic terrorism in U.S. history. The attack was carried out by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, who sought to retaliate against the federal government, particularly in response to the Waco siege in 1993 and the Ruby Ridge incident in 1992. Civil War Santa Claus is coming to town.

          LikeLike

      12. Democracy’s faults are legion and non-partisan. They exist in the US and Israel but my travels around the world show life is better in a Democracy.

          Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

          LikeLiked by 1 person

      13. Marco Rubio Sanctions ICC Judges After They Target U.S. and Israel in Explosive Rulings

          In a sweeping move, Senator Marco Rubio announced sanctions against four International Criminal Court justices.
          ________________________________________
          ________________________________________

          Marco Rubio’s sanctions on ICC judges—in response to politically driven rulings targeting the U.S. and Israel—represent the first serious American pushback against the expanding overreach of international legal institutions. But these sanctions merely scratch the surface. If Israel were to bomb the International Criminal Court in The Hague for the crime of judicial overreach, it would unleash a shockwave through the foundations of the post-WWII European imperial legal order.

          Such an act would shatter the illusion that the Rome Statute and its court represent binding global authority. In truth, the ICC is a political weapon wielded disproportionately against Western democracies and their allies, while shielding rogue regimes. Its authority rests on consensus, not enforcement. The Rome Treaty would be exposed as not worth the paper it’s written on.

          Europe forfeited its moral right to judge the Jewish people the moment it orchestrated the Shoah. Any European claim to universal justice—especially when applied selectively against the Jewish state—is hypocrisy cloaked in humanitarianism. The ICC’s rulings against Israel are not about war crimes; they are ritual acts of expiation for Europe’s own genocidal guilt. But that guilt is not Israel’s burden to carry. To bomb the ICC would be to formally reject Europe’s post-Nazi pretensions to legal supremacy and declare: “You have no right to judge us.”

          Bombing the ICC would have the same historical effect as the 1956 Suez Crisis: the end of European claims to independent geopolitical authority. Just as France and the UK’s failed bid to reclaim the Suez Canal revealed their imperial impotence, an Israeli destruction of the ICC would reveal the EU’s inability to project legal-moral power beyond its own borders.

          What the EU has is not law, but a narrative infrastructure—paper treaties, postmodern guilt, and international NGOs wielding legal language as a substitute for lost religious and imperial confidence.

          A targeted Israeli strike on the ICC would not trigger war. It would trigger disbelief, followed by narrative collapse, and finally a global reckoning with Western legal hypocrisy. The EU would be faced with the question: do we escalate to save face—or submit to an Israeli dictate which radically limits the EU authority in the balance of power in the Middle East and in Europe.

          If Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for the crime of judicial over-reach. This would set a precedent that the establishment of the ICC through the Rome Treaty – not worth the paper the Rome Treaty written upon. Widespread EU condemnations Big Deal. England and France have already broken off diplomatic relations with Israel.

          The Trump Government in Washington most likely would support Israel if Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for judicial over-reach. The Rome Treaty established Court would most likely dissolve. It would most definitely challenge the judicial jurisdiction of a European Court over Israel!

          Post Shoah Europe lost its rights to judge Jews. The destruction of the Pie in the Sky Rome Treaty would establish a major political precedent that European imperialism stops at the borders of the EU member states alone.

          The assertion that bombing the ICC in The Hague would lead to a collapse of the EU’s prestige is a strong viewpoint that reflects significant concerns about the authority and effectiveness of international institutions.

          If a member state or a country with significant geopolitical influence, like Israel, were to attack an international institution such as the ICC, it could be perceived as a direct challenge to the authority of not only the ICC but also the broader framework of international law that the EU supports.

          In short: bombing the Court of the Hague would radically change the balance of power in Europe. For the first time since the Muslim invasion of Western Europe a major disruption of European political autonomy would result.

          The EU would either put up or shut up: either they would declare War against Israel or not. The Nato alliance, if the US backed Israel would unquestionably collapse. The EU’s credibility as a defender of international law would cease to exist – gone like a puff of smoke. Israel would have called the bluff of the EU, like as if bombing the ICC compares to a hand of stud poker! This could lead to a more fragmented international order, challenging the EU’s role as a global actor.

          An attack on the ICC could set a precedent that undermines the enforcement of international law, leading to a situation where states feel empowered to act unilaterally without regard for international institutions.

          The incident could complicate diplomatic relations not only between Israel and the EU but also between other countries and international organizations. It could lead to a reevaluation of how states engage with international legal frameworks.

          The UN itself would most likely collapse like as did the League of Nations. If nothing else, the historical relationship between Europe and Israel, particularly in the context of the Shoah and post-war UN attempt to compare Israel to the European Nazi crimes against humanity, adds layers of complexity to this European projectionism of its own Nazi guilt and the moral bankruptcy of both Western and Eastern Roman church moral authority over European civilizations.

          The implications of such an act would resonate deeply within the historical narrative of European-Jewish relations and radically shift the narrative reversing the role of Jews as dominant and the church as dhimmi slaves – utterly rejected and despised.

          The entire European security architecture is underwritten by the United States, both financially and militarily. Without U.S. backing, NATO becomes functionally hollow. France and the UK retain nuclear capability, but their conventional power is insufficient to act independently against a U.S.-aligned state like Israel.

          No EU state would risk confrontation with the U.S., their most vital ally, over a non-NATO event like an Israeli action against the ICC. EU states are deeply post-military in culture. Their battlefield is law, narrative, and diplomacy—not armed force.

          Even in the face of Russian invasion (Ukraine), EU states have limited direct engagement, preferring economic sanctions, legal resolutions, and humanitarian aid. Against Israel, the EU’s instinct would be: denounce, sanction, isolate—not mobilize or fight.

          Much of EU condemnation of Israel is a projection of its own unresolved guilt over colonialism and the Holocaust. This moral outrage stops at the threshold of real cost. That’s why you see relentless UN resolutions, ICC motions, and media warfare—but not realpolitik confrontation. Israel calling their bluff—if the U.S. holds firm—exposes their impotence. If Israel bombed the ICC in the Hague – No War. No boots. No tanks. NO Article 5 Nato involvement. The collapse of Nato as an alliance.

          Symbolic institutions (like the ICC) to claim moral authority—but has no spine when force or geopolitical will counters that narrative. If Israel, backed by a U.S. administration, were to shatter a legal myth like the ICC’s authority … No war, but rather most likely the total collapse of EU imperialist Post WWII illusion of legal hegemony on par with England and France failure to capture and seize the Suez canal in the 1956 War. It would clearly reset the terms of European involvement in global legal power.

          LikeLike

      14. Two Classic Examples of how Xtianity remains a dead religion on par with the Gods of Mt. Olympus.

          Jim Zwinglius Redivivus
          Jim·zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com

          Remembering Prof. dr. W. van ’t Spijker
          Prof. dr. W. van ’t Spijker died on Friday, July 23, 2021. You can read his obituary here. If you aren’t familiar with him, he was a scholar of the Reformation. And a very, very goo…
          _____________________________________
          _____________________________________

          Theological Complicity in State Violence

          Calvinism and Lutheranism Compared: Prof. Dr. Willem van ‘t Spijker (1926–2021), a leading Dutch Calvinist theologian, made substantial contributions to church history, ecclesiastical law, and the development of Reformed theology. Yet his work conspicuously failed to grapple with one of the most catastrophic consequences of the Protestant Reformation: The Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648).

          At the heart of Reformed theology lies the doctrine of predestination—the belief that God has foreordained all events, including salvation and damnation. This framework fostered a militant providentialism: war was interpreted as a divine tool, victory as confirmation of righteousness, and suffering as sanctification; terror Islam sanctifies its martyrs this very day. Such logic fueled the religious zealotry of Protestant-Catholic conflicts in early modern Europe and sacralized political violence. Calvinist theologians, including van ‘t Spijker, largely failed to confront the theological and moral implications of their tradition’s role in igniting and escalating such brutal barbaric bloodshed.

          This blind spot extended far beyond the Reformation. A similar theological detachment reemerged during the Nazi era, when much of Protestant Europe—especially the Lutheran Church in Germany—collapsed morally in the face of totalitarianism and genocide. The result was catastrophic: 75% of Western European Jewry and 63% of European and Russian Jews were annihilated. Churches failed to resist—and in many cases collaborated with—Nazism, cloaking their cowardice or complicity in theological rationalizations of “obedience” and “providence.”

          Van ‘t Spijker’s silence on these historical-theological intersections utterly emblematic of a much broader failure within Reformed scholarship: the inability to reckon with how doctrinal systems, when left unchallenged, enable state violence. Without such critical introspection, the Reformed tradition risks perpetuating a theology disconnected from its own ethical consequences.

          Both Calvinist and Lutheran systems share foundational errors that—when unchecked—open the door to theological barbarism. In Calvinist thought, God’s sovereign will is absolute; every event, from salvation to catastrophe, is predetermined. During the Thirty Years’ War, this led to a dangerous fusion of theology and politics: military victory was seen as a sign of divine favor, while political violence became a “righteous” necessity. Calvinist churches, despite their strong synodal structures, proved unable—or unwilling—to restrain theological alliances with princely power. This alignment justified widespread bloodshed, famine, and forced displacement as sacred duty.

          Martin Luther’s “Two Kingdoms” doctrine separated the spiritual and political realms, teaching that secular rulers are divinely appointed and must not be resisted. By the 20th century, this was transformed into an ideological bludgeon by the German Christian movement, which fused Lutheranism with Nazism. Clergy upheld obedience even as the state descended into genocide. Though the Barmen Declaration (1934), led by Karl Barth, attempted to resist this theological capitulation, the Confessing Church remained a marginalized minority. The institutional Lutheran Church stood largely silent—or worse, supportive—as the Nazis murdered millions, including the overwhelming majority of European Jewry.

          Calvinism, with its emphasis on God’s glory and man’s depravity, lacked a theology of inherent human dignity. Jews, Catholics, and heretics were viewed as reprobates—predestined for damnation, beyond grace, justice, or mercy. This theological posture helped normalize righteous violence against those outside the “elect.”

          Lutheran theology was even more explicit. Luther’s own antisemitic writings—On the Jews and Their Lies (1543)—called for synagogue burnings and expulsion. These ideas laid the groundwork for Christian racial antisemitism. The Nazi vision of the Jew drew directly from centuries of Lutheran contempt and theological supersessionism: the idea that Christianity had replaced Israel as God’s chosen; where Jesus as the son of God replace the oath brit sworn to Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov that they would father the chosen Cohen people.

          Therefore, in both cases, the churches failed to resist tyranny not only because of fear—but because their theological systems lacked a mechanism to challenge it from within. In the end, the failure of both Reformed traditions was not merely a failure of courage—but a failure of theological architecture. Their systems lacked internal mechanisms—legal, moral, or interpretive—to challenge tyranny from within. When state violence aligned itself with religious rhetoric, these traditions were intellectually disarmed.

          Whereas Jewish tradition sustains a culture of legal argumentation, known as משנה תורה/Legislative Review; grounded in the courtroom common law which stands upon prior judical precedent courtroom rulings. European courts lack the power to overrule the State. A critical flaw that NT theology, in all its many forms or formats, has totally failed to address. Neither Christianity nor Islam has the cultural tradition of judicial “prophets”.

          Both “daughter religions” define prophesy as – foretelling the future. The Torah views this interpretation as Av tuma witchcraft. According to the Torah prophets command mussar. How does mussar define prophesy? Mussar applies equally across the board to all generations of the chosen Cohen people. Only the chosen Cohen people received and accepted the Torah revelation at Sinai and Horev.

          Both Christian and Muslim theological creed belief systems emphatically embrace a theology of Monotheism. Alas monotheism violates the 2nd Sinai commandment. Only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai. Therefore the God of the chosen Cohen people a local tribal God and not a Universal God as Christian and Islamic theology dictates to its believers.

          In the end, the failure of both Reformed and Lutheran traditions was not merely a lack of courage, but a failure of theological design. These systems lacked the internal instruments—legal, prophetic, interpretive—needed to resist tyranny when it arose cloaked in religious language.

          LikeLike

      15. Thank you. Religion is a source of strength and weakness in humanity. At times it aids humanity and at other times it kills humanity. 

          Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

          LikeLiked by 1 person

      16. An interesting discussion on this topic with Frank Hubeny. His opinion I would like to share with you. Frank Hubeny writes:

          Frank Hubeny

          2m agoPoetry, Short Prose and Walking

          I agree with much of the criticism of Calvinism in your comment associated with Jim Zwinglius Redivivus. Indeed, one can look at this from a higher perspective. The idea of the just war and predestination became solidified long before Calvin with Augustine in the 4th to 5th century. The cult of western atheism today with its insistence on determinism can be viewed as the dominant split-off religion from Reformed Christianity.

          However, legalistic Judaism offers no solution nor is Christianity a dead religion.

          As I mentioned to you earlier, Akiva in the 1st to 2nd century did severe damage to both Judaism, and indirectly Christianity, by permitting, if not planning, the reduction in the Genesis 5 and 11 genealogies. This reduced Judaism to rabbinic legalism which puffed up the rabbis. It discredited the Bible (Tanach) as history.

          Recover your history. Take it seriously. Stop proclaiming your dead legalism as something of value. It is little more than another sub-cult of western atheism.

          And I responded with:

          mosckerr
          July 24, 2025 at 3:01 pm Edit
          Legalistic Judaism King David undermined, according to the opinions raised within the Yerushalmi Talmud which argue that after David conquered Damascus – that he failed to establish a City of Refuge ie small Sanhedrin courtroom therein. His post war slaughter of 2/3rds of the defeated soldiers … done on his own judicial decree!

          Then came his son Shlomo – what a disaster. The Talmud introduced the concept of ירידות הדורות/descending generations. This abstract term has two major branches of interpretation.

          Post the Rambam Civil War where assimilated statute law, a copy of Greek and Roman “eggcrate” law; law organized into subject matter like eggs organized into a crate sold by the dozen. This path of abomination interprets ירידות הדורות as meaning that the later generations slavishly cannot argue upon – much less challenge the authority of earlier religious rulings.

          Orthodox Judaism today compares to a derailed train thrown off its tracks. Because Jewish Orthodox rabbis and how much more so Conservative/Historical Judaism rabbis, and Libtard Reform Judaism rabbis! Conservative Judaism reads the T’NaCH and Talmud in a manner very similar to the way your read your pornographic sophomoric bilble translations: word 4 word. You “believe” the God created the world in 6 days and rested on Sunday. LOL Conservative rabbis suffer from this delusion as well. Many of them, very nice people like yourself. Perhaps the comparison of Democrap ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’, viewed from this perspective makes sense. Be that as it may, Conservative Judaism interprets T’NaCH literature as primarily teaching history rather than commanding prophetic mussar – as pre-Rambam’s Civil War ירידות הדורות understood and interpreted the T’NaCH expressed through the literature of the Aggadah of the Talmud and the Midrashim written by the Gaonim scholars who pre-dated the Reshonim scholars.

          Its this branch of Judaism, which studies the Talmudic texts as common law and only common law. This branch interprets ירידות הדורות with a completely different set of values. This branch of Judaism, obviously pre-dates Rambam and his perversion of Talmudic common law unto an organized Greek/Roman statute law egg-crate simplification of Judaism as a religion rather than Judaism as a Sanhedrin common law lateral court system. Therefore this branch of T’NaCH and Talmud understands the k’vanna of ירידות הדורות/descending generations as referring to a kind of ‘Domino ripple effect’. Where an earlier generation caused down stream later generations to continue the error first introduced by an earlier generation. Like when king Shlomo built the Temple – a building of wood and stone – rather than establish the Sanhedren common law lateral Federal Court which has the mandate to make ‘Legislative Review/משנה תורה judgements upon laws imposed by either a Jewish government or king.

          Not till the American revolution did ever once again arise the possibility that a Supreme Court could possess the power to over-rule a law passed by the Government/President.

          Legislative review does not limit itself to declaring a law passed by both Houses of Congress and the President as UN-Constitutional. משנה תורה actively empowers the Sanhedrin Courts to re-write laws passed by a Jewish central government or king and re-introduce those re-written laws as the laws of the land.

          Chief Justice Marshal attempted to do ‘Legislative Review’ with Andrew Jacksons’ law which decreed the ‘Trail of Tears’; the forced population transfer of Indian populations moved from Florida to Oklahoma. Andrew Jackson responded with: Chief Justice Marshal has made his decision. Now let me see him enforce it!

          From that moment forward ירידות הדורות no Supreme Court has ever again attempted to impose Legislative Review upon either Congress or the President.

          Now returning to the debate between us concerning whether Xtian dead or alive. You say this stinking rotting corpse breaths. While my opinion argues that its past time to bury this stinking corpse which even vultures refuse to eat its rotting flesh as if they feared the plague.

          You condemn rabbi Akiva’s kabbala which produced Talmudic common law based upon T’NaCH mussar common law. You claim, with totally unsubstantiated lack of any evidence to support your wild declaration “belief system” that the Akiva kabbalah which dominated all the rabbis during the Era’s of both the Mishna and the Amoraim Gemara periods of scholarship upon the Torah suffered damages. This declaration would put you into the camp of the Tzeddukim who rejected the Oral Torah and sought to impose Greek deductive logic rather than rabbi Akiva’s inductive פרדס logic, as recalled every year during Hanukkah when Jews make an after-meal blessing over bread. There, in that specific after-meal blessing, contained the remembrance that the Tzeddukim, referred to as רשעים sought to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah.

          Now you as a Goy declare that rabbi Akiva’s פרדס kabbalah of inductive logic damaged Judaism and Xtianity. Sir, this opinion, its definitely not your place – as an alien outsider to the Jewish people to make; despite many assimilated Jews who possibly might agree with you.

          Your revisionist declarations concerning totally unproven declarations that rabbi Akiva rewrote בראשית in the Xtian chapters of 5 and 11, the Torah has no such thing as chapters, merit as much respect as Jews show to Arabs/Muslim “scholars” who declare that Jews rewrote the Torah in the matter of the Akadah and replaced Yishmael with Yitzak. Utter bunk and total narishkeit bull shit.

          A list of genealogies as taught in the Torah masoret, serves as the continuation of the Central Theme within the entire Torah of Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov fathering the chosen Cohen people. Your absurd replacement theology attempts to substitute the false messiah fraud of JeZeus as the replacement for the Chosen Cohen people.

          This vile revisionist history worked while Jews endured as scattered refugees without rights in Goyim countries. Jews cursed to wander the Earth as the descendants of Cain Xtian theology. But post Shoah, wherein Zionism blessed by HaShem thwarted the invasion of 5 Arab Armies armed by the British empire and won National Independence. Sir, thereafter the shoe of exile now all Xtian societies forced to wear. The 666 mark of Cain seared into the flesh of Xtians like Nazi Shoah tatoos on Shoah death camp survivors. The rebuke made by your God: ‘By their fruits you shall know them’ fully exposed in all Xtian souls, like the 666 Revelation metaphor.

          My generation, we strive to restore the Torah as the Written Constitution of our Republic of 12 Tribes/States. We strive equally to lean upon the Talmud as the working model to restore lateral Sanhedrin common law courtrooms mandated with the power of Legislative Review over all Central Governments in Jerusalem and all Tribal/State governments across the Republic.

          LikeLike

      17. Thanks for sharing. I am in awe of your knowledge.

          Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

          LikeLiked by 1 person

      18. Av Tuma Temple worship avoda zara replacement theology, duplicates the sin of the Golden Calf – replacement theology – where ערב רב רשעים בני עמלק attempted to substitute for the 1st Commandment שם השם לשמה with the word translation – אלהים. Therefore the Torah commands the mitzva to uproot the memory of עמלק from the world; this commandment of the tohor middah of רחום, refers to the weak and morally exhausted ערב רב, whom עמלק attacked – which originally came out of Egyptian bondage in the days of Moshe and Aaron – as a people who have no fear of אלהים.

          The sin of the Golden Calf, this Av tuma substitute theology, defines all other Av tuma avoda zara as the definition of the prohibition which the 2nd Sinai commandment commands. Avoda zara, it most essentially spins around the central axis of assimilated and intermarried Jews, throughout the generations. Its this “exact” ערב רב, which has no fear of אלהים — the name that the original ערב רב, that that generation named the Av tuma golden calf abomination — אלו אלהים שיצאו ‘וכו. This curse of Av tuma avoda zarah explains the mitza: to war against Amalek/antisemitism, caused by Jewish assimilation and intermarriage throughout all the generation which the Jewish walk the face of this Earth.

          The first, but most definitely not the last; the original “replacement theology” where ערב רב רשעים בני עמלק assimilated and intermarried Jews attempt again and again and again and again etc., to substitute for the 1st Commandment שם השם לשמה with the word אלהים, or Jesus or Allah god substitute Word-names. Therefore the Torah in the specific mitzva to uproot the memory of עמלק from the world, its k’vanna to do this tohor time-oriented positive commandment, refers to the weak ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Jews whom עמלק originally attacked when Moshe and Aaron first brought Israel out of Egyptian bondage – its this ערב רב which – as a people – has no fear of אלהים.

          The sin of the Golden Calf, the substitute theology of this Av tuma definition of all avoda zarah prohibitions as defined and framed by the 2nd Sinai commandment mandate, which spins around the central axis of assimilated and intermarried Jews, throughout the generations, that this ערב רב, has no fear of אלהים — the name they originally named their Av tuma Golden Calf abomination — אלו אלהים שיצאו ‘וכו. This Torah curse, this Av tuma avoda zarah – it explains the mitza: to war against Amalek/antisemitism, caused by Jewish assimilation and intermarriage –throughout all the generations that Jews walk the face of this Earth.

          YAHRZEITS — JULY, 2025

          RAM’S HORN POLICY FOR LISTING YAHRZEIT MEMORIALS:!
          Yahrzeit memorials are listed by consecutive Gregorian month, date, and year, if known

          Rejoicing in the month of Av. The burning and destruction of the two Av tuma avoda zarah Temples responsible for the ירידות הדורות ripple – domino effect – upon all down stream generations. Closing in on Chag ט באב. Hey Yea the witch is dead! Kick the רשע king Shlomo in his Head; together with Herod’s Temple abomination that too and likewise offered barbeques unto Heaven. Rather than judicial Sanhedrin common law courtroom justice or ‘Legislative Review’/משנה תורה as the meaning and definition of the k’vanna of the commandment of king David which commanded as his last will and testament for his son Shlomo — the fool, which the Book of מלכים satires by referring to him as the ‘wisest of all men’ tongue in cheek mockery, to build the בית המקדש.

          The Aitz Chaim Ram’s Horn

          Joy Breslauer·aitzchaim.com·16m ago

          YAHRZEITS — JULY, 2025

          RAM’S HORN POLICY FOR LISTING YAHRZEIT MEMORIALS:!
          Yahrzeit memorials are listed by consecutive Gregorian month, date, and year, if known

          Rejoicing in the month of Av. The burning and destruction of the two Av tuma avoda zarah Temples responsible for the ירידות הדורות ripple – domino effect upon all down stream generations. Closing in on Chag ט באב. Whooooooooooooooooooooooooop. Dance and sing and cast stones upon the graves of king Shlomo and the Rambam! The latter too and likewise triggered an Av tuma ירידות הדורות ‘ripple-domino effect’ upon down stream generations of Yiddishkeit when his switch N’ bait exchanged T’NaCH mussar & Talmudic halacha common law legal systems with Greek & Roman culture/styles of Statute law which organizes law into subject matter, much like a dozon of eggs sold in cardboard egg-crates! This רשע imposed Greek logic the 3 part Aristotle syllogism model of deductive logic in the place of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס four part inductive reasoning process.

          The Talmud breaks down into a warp/weft Halachic\Aggadic loom like “fabric” which shapes and determines the culture and customs of the chosen Cohen people of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. The ירידות הדורות ripple-domino effect of the Rambam Civil War, remember Hanukkah and the Civil War between the Tzeddukim against the P’rushim, blew out the Hanukkah Lights! An eternal ט’ באב אב טומא עבודה זרה abomination. Greek deductive logic not the same as the kabbalah taught by Rabbi Akiva who fought the Romans and died לשמה with the oath of the Avot the tefillah דאורייתא of kre’a shma – his dying spirit.

          Rambam, both his statute law assimilated code and his Guide for the Perplexed which expressly and openly promoted Greek logic over the kabbalah taught by rabbi Akiva through both the Mishna and the Gemara which make up the Talmud Bavli and Yerushalmi; together with the Midrash commentary to the Aggada composed by the Gaonim scholars which pre-dated the Reshonim! Rabbeinu Tam’s commentary on the Talmud criticized the Rashi commentary for its lack of emphasis upon the priority of learning the Talmud as common law. Learning off the dof to a different Mesechta of Gemara compares to reading a blue print based upon a different perspective of the same exact blue-print which has no less than 3 primary perspectives. The Talmud has 70 faces to the Torah!

          The term משנה תורה which the Rambam code converted to a Catholic priest, means common law — not statute law! Just as Rabbeinu Tam criticized the error made by Rashi of not prioritizing the critical and essential importance of studying Talmud – together with T’NaCH prophetic mussar through Aggadic & Midrashic common law precedents – so too the commentary made by the Baali Tosofot, specifically Rabbeinu Tam, failed to prioritize making a משנה תורה upon the language of the Mishna itself; the Baali Tosafot commentary limited its משנה תורה/Legislative Review only to reviewing the sugya of Gemara viewed from an off the dof different perspective of the גזר שוה. But dismally failed to likewise make a משנה תורה re-interpretation of the k’vanna of the language of the Mishna – viewed from a completely different perspective.

          All the Reshonim scholars open to honest criticism. The B’HaG, Rif and Rosh common law codes failed to emphasize employing halacha from the Gemara as a משנה תורה בנין אב to re-investigate the intent of the language of the Mishna based upon the different halachic different perspectives! The wisdom of reading a Blue Print requires the integration of Top/Side\Top viewpoints to grasp the 3 dimensional Big Picture idea. So too both T’NaCH and Talmudic common law equally requires a similar type of wisdom. Rote reading of words on the page, does not learn T’NaCH and Talmudic prophetic mussar and halachic common law.

          The study of T’NaCH and Talmud and Midrashim as common law legalism, this scholarship seeks to learn mitzvot commandments not only as positive and negative commandments as the Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot, together with his lackey followers – dictates! These complete fools “believe” that later generations cannot dispute with earlier generations as the meaning of the Talmudic term ירידות הדורות. Bunk, a critical error of Torah scholarship based upon cowardice.

          Rather the study of T’NaCH and Talmudic/Midrashim common law seeks to make an Av tohor הבדלה which separates Shabbat from Chol; which distinguishes Av tohor Time-Oriented commanments from תולדות secondary קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה commandments which do not require k’vanna. Rote learning limits the Torah to two-dimensional box-thinking wherein Torah mitzvot done robotically and mechanically without any k’vanna what so ever. K’vanna defined in this rebuke as meaning “Prophetic mussar learned from the T’NaCH by means of Aggadic and Midrashic common law sources”! No Yeshiva, post the Rambam Civil War abomination which blew out the Hanukkah Lights and negated the victory of the P’rushim teachers of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס kabbalah of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev … and substituted the Tzeddukim faithlessness which rejects the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev.

          During the 9 Days Jews have either the choice to mourn the loss of buildings made of wood and stone – comparable to idols. Or absolutely rejoice at the uprooting and total destruction of Av tuma avoda zara ripped from the Yatzir Ha’Rah within the hearts of the chosen Cohen people who worship HaShem through doing tohor Time-oriented mitzvot from both the Torah and the Talmud, like as taught by the B’HaG! It seems to me, especially with Israeli National Independence consequence to the vision of political Zionism of Herzl that the time has come to cast away the black mourning garments of g’lut. And rejoice at the prospect of restoring the Written Torah as the Constitution of our Republic of Tribes/States. Where we make the Talmud serve as the model to restore Federal Sanhedrin common law court rooms which impose Capital Crimes Courts to judge cases of murder, in the primary border-land cities like king David conquering Damascus, stands the obligation to establish a City of Refuge with a Small Sanhedrin Capital Crime common law courtroom. A blessing upon the generations of Israel that we might achieve the destiny of the chosen Cohen people; the seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov as defined by the Torah oath brit alliance.

          LikeLike

      19. The false messiah Obozo–Santa Claus — is going to stand trial. Its Obozo and Clinton’s turn to take a police mug shot and sit inside a courtroom accused of treason. The question: did Obozo, Clinton, Pelosi, Schiff and other democraps attempt to make a coup following the 2016 elections

          Perhaps the greatest political scandal in all American history …

          It’s CHECKMATE: Trump’s Brilliant Move Just ENDED the Deep State’s Game! – YouTube
          Tulsi Gabbard Exposes the Russia Hoax | Victor Davis Hanson
          Tulsi Gabbard Speaks On Russia Hoax From The White House – YouTube

          LikeLike

      20. Brilliance is in the eye of the beholder. I have a completely different opinion of Trump, as you know.

          Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

          LikeLiked by 1 person

      21. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTJURY INSTRUCTION: THE PEOPLE v. OBAMA, CLINTON, BIDEN

          Indictment: Treachery Against the Republic

          I. TO THE JURY WHO STANDS BETWEEN CIVILIZATION AND COLLAPSE

          You did not arrive here to listen.
          You stand to judge, strike, condemn, and defend the nation’s breath.
          The accused did not misstep.
          They plotted, manipulated, shoved the Republic to its knees, and rammed a legal dagger between its ribs.
          They shredded oath.
          They gutted law.
          They muzzled voters and spit in the face of the Constitution.
          You do not cradle justice gently.
          You slam it like an axe through rotten wood.

          II. COUNT ONE: CONSPIRACY TO SHATTER THE UNITED STATES

          Barack Obama hatched, Hillary Clinton injected, and Joe Biden peddled a nationwide scheme to cripple Donald Trump, paralyze the presidency, and kidnap the federal apparatus.
          They fabricated evidence, dangled lies like bait, and jammed fraudulent reports into courtrooms like crowbars.
          They unleashed the CIA, twisted the FBI into a political blade, and forced innocent men through false investigations.
          They nailed disinformation to public walls, then danced on truth’s corpse.
          This crew didn’t govern.
          They hijacked, blackmailed, and torched public trust for a seat at the throne.

          III. COUNT TWO: OBSTRUCTION THROUGH SABOTAGE

          Joe Biden’s lawyers didn’t defend legality.
          They drowned it.
          They buried evidence, not beneath procedure, but under intentional rot.
          They strangled laptops, froze investigations, and scraped every thread of accountability from the federal map.
          They choked whistleblowers, chased down dissenters, and set fire to transparency.
          They didn’t delay justice—they gutted it with garden shears and fed the scraps to political dogs.

          IV. COUNT THREE: ELECTION INTERFERENCE BY JUDICIAL ASSAULT

          They didn’t trust the ballot box, so they ambushed it.
          They smeared Trump with indictments, pinned courtrooms to his chest like explosives, and rushed trial after trial like a firing squad with gavels.
          They pressured secretaries of state, erased his name from ballots, and dragged him through lawfare swamps during election season.
          They flooded headlines with venom, lobbed charges to generate chaos, and faked neutrality with the dead eyes of bureaucratic wolves.
          This wasn’t politics.
          This reeked of coup.

          V. COUNT FOUR: IMPOSTER PRESIDENCY

          Joe Biden didn’t lead—his handlers propped him like a scarecrow, then whispered policy through his dentures.
          They fed him pills, rigged teleprompters, and marionetted his limbs through briefings.
          They hollowed the executive branch, trapped it in dementia, and plastered the facade with “normalcy” while reality burned.
          They cloaked regime control in elder abuse, then pushed the corpse forward like a battering ram of plausible deniability.
          This wasn’t governance.
          This stitched Frankenstein from election fraud and cognitive decline, then forced Americans to salute it.

          VI. COUNT FIVE: DOMESTIC INSURRECTION DISGUISED AS DEMOCRACY

          This cabal did not defend democracy—they smashed its skull on the marble floor of the Capitol, then wore its skin like a costume.
          They commandeered intelligence agencies, converted watchdogs into lapdogs, and launched war against half the country.
          They recruited news anchors as propaganda mouthpieces, muzzled dissent, and rigged every lever of federal power to silence Trump.
          They slashed the throat of separation of powers, crucified truth, and pissed on the ashes of constitutional restraint.
          These weren’t mishaps.
          These exploded from deliberate, cold-blooded betrayal.

          VII. THE VERDICT NOW BELONGS TO YOU

          You don’t weigh feelings.
          You grind facts like bone under molars.
          You don’t interpret law like scholars.
          You swing it like a mace against corruption.
          If you believe the accused:
          Strangled elections,
          Rigged courts,
          Sabotaged justice,
          Hijacked power by deceit and cognitive puppetry,
          Then you must deliver the only verdict that protects this Union from permanent decay:
          GUILTY
          On every count
          Without remorse
          Without delay

          CLOSING

          History does not whisper here.
          It screams.
          Speak your verdict with the roar of the republic reclaiming its spine.

          LikeLike

      22. You don’t attract. You pull fate in.

          Swamigalkodi Astrology©NAVAGRA – A FREE VEDIC HOROSCOPE READING PLACE

          astrological attraction astrology for love spiritual magnetism fated relationships karmic connection

          You don’t attract. You don’t seek. You wait, and they come. Something in you pulls them. Not your words. Not your eyes. Something beneath that. A soft gravity. A current they can’t see. It moves through your stillness. It hums in your silence. They notice you before you speak. Especially then. You don’t attract. You pull fate in.
          _____________________________________________________
          _____________________________________________________

          Magnetism – lonely (intense connections, but not always reciprocated or understood) and complex (the nature of these connections; both nurturing or challenging, reflecting different aspects of ourselves) to define our own identity as a person, and for others to grasp, appreciate, and understand. None-the-less, magnetism compares to how fire entices insects to fly into the flames.

          Fate: Personal Destiny in a persons life walk-path. Events, relationships, and experiences astrological influences shaped through personal choices within Life’s Big Picture. Attraction – like basic instincts in animals vs. Pulling, a far more profound connection – like family which speaks to the soul. Less a physical allure, it compliments long standing emotional memories. Presence: your design shaped by your astrological chart and life experiences; and Stillness – a quiet, a grounded confidence: ‘safe space’ for others. It does not require words for it to express this ‘safe space’ sweet smelling perfume. Echoes and Memory, refers to something like your future born children. Energies we share can leave a legacy, shaping not only our lives but also the lives of those who come after us. Energy Exchange, a dynamic interaction between individuals. A healthy sharing relationship with trusted friends.

          Astrology and Chinese Taoist thought work in harmony with meditation. Which contrasts the in-haled breath with the exhaled breath. Zen Buddhism refers to the ‘3rd Eye’ as a reference to a focused awareness of the 5 senses “seen” (so to speak) between the eyes during the duration of the inhaled breath. Meditation “feels” the chi expressed within the external reality of living during the duration of the exhaled breath. This meditation seeks to achieve a conscious Mind awareness both internally felt and externally experienced. Hence Taoism has the 5 breath “souls”, in conjuction with the 5 designated feelings – and they all align with the 5 elements of the Universe.

          Unlike Astrology, both Chinese and Japanese healing makes its central focus – awareness of precise meridian points and lines rather that Planets and Stars shining in the Heavens above. The shared common denominator which unites the two contrasting disciplines — meditation. Both disciplines which lack meditation compare to positive and negative Torah commandments which have no tohor time-oriented commandment potential to elevate secondary commandments and halachot unto Av tohor time-oriented commandments from the Torah.

          For example: The so-called daughter religions of Xtianity and Islam – both remain Av tuma avoda zarah examples of the 2nd Sinai Commandment. These religions employ their own separate but unique ‘replacement theologies’, which supplants T’NaCH, Talmud, Midrashim and Siddur – along with the power of Astrology of Planets and Stars – with Creed based belief systems. Such as belief in some pie in the sky Universal God monotheism! This theology employed to supplant T’NaCH, Talmud, Midrashim, and Siddur.

          For example: The Apostle Paul declared Torah commandments like circumcision archaic and invalid. Reform Judaism pulled a similar rabbit out of its hat of magik. The Pauline rhetoric declared that Goyim “not under the Law”; an utterly absurd statement because all societies and civilization require the Order of law and government. Furthermore, the Pauline propaganda, much like Obamo’s 2008 political “CHANGE” declarations made no distinction between T’NaCH & Talmudic judicial common law Legislative Review, which has over-view of all laws passed by Legislatures or Kings; from legal statute law – decrees, issued from some Roman Senate or a Caesar bureaucratic regulatory dictatorship.

          Jewish common law depends upon lateral common law courtrooms rather than Greek political rhetoric which promotes ‘Democracy’. Democracy has no place in T’NaCH and Talmudic lateral common law courtrooms. The people pay for ‘Legal Insurance’ which maintains these common law Courts – when not actively engaged in any legal dispute heard before these common law Courtrooms. The Torah refers to vertical courtrooms as bribery; a Torah abomination for the State to pay the salary of Court Justices and prosecuting attorneys.

          Following the corruption made by the British Star-Courts which legalized British navel impressment of American sailors seized from American ships in High Seas ‘international waters’. The Founding Fathers attempted to address the issue of Judicial bribery by and through the State. They established the lateral jury system. But the otherwise vertical courtrooms, where the State pays the salaries of the Judges and Prosecuting Attorneys, American judicial law bi-passed the lateral jury court revolutionary approach, by imposing strict terms which limit the scope of how the jury weighs introduced legal evidence/precedents by the opposing lawyers briefs.

          Lawyers do not present their legal briefs to the Jury. Rather, the vertical courts restrict presentation of these opposing legal briefs, which only the State paid judges can review. Hence while the Founding Fathers attempted to establish lateral courtrooms, later generations corrupted the revolutionary lateral jury judicial system. And replaced it with just another vertical court having bribed Judges and Prosecuting Attorneys.

          LikeLike

      23. The bankrupt 35 Trillion dollar national debt Federal Government took post Civil War to present Federal corruption to currently threaten America with its 2nd Civil War.

          OKC bombing redux

          In the past I’ve written about it ad nauseam — the Oklahoma City bombing on April 19, 1995. Then, two nights ago, there it was again in a series of three hour-long episodes
          _________________________________
          _________________________________

          Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols their motivations were deeply rooted in their opposition to government actions, particularly the Waco siege in 1993, where the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) attempted to execute a search warrant at the Branch Davidian compound, leading to a standoff that resulted in the deaths of 76 individuals. Additionally, the Ruby Ridge incident in 1992, which involved a confrontation between federal agents and the Weaver family, further fueled their anti-government sentiments. McVeigh and Nichols meticulously planned the bombing, believing that it would send a strong message against what they perceived as government overreach and tyranny.

          On April 19, 1995, McVeigh parked a rented Ryder truck filled with explosives outside the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. The explosion, which occurred at 9:02 AM, caused widespread destruction and resulted in significant loss of life. The bombing resulted in the deaths of 168 people, including 19 children, and injured over 600 others. It caused significant destruction to the surrounding area and damaged or destroyed several nearby buildings.

          The Waco siege and the Ruby Ridge incident were two significant events in the 1990s that involved confrontations between federal law enforcement and individuals or groups that were perceived as threats to public safety or law and order. Both incidents raised serious questions about the use of government authority and the actions taken by federal agents. The Waco siege involved the Branch Davidian religious sect, led by David Koresh, who was suspected of stockpiling illegal weapons. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) attempted to execute a search warrant on February 28, 1993, which led to a gunfight and the deaths of four ATF agents and six Branch Davidians.

          The federal government, under President Bill Clinton, justified the siege as a necessary action to enforce laws regarding illegal weapons and to protect public safety. The FBI took over the operation, which lasted for 51 days, culminating in a final assault on April 19, 1993, that resulted in a fire that consumed the compound, killing 76 individuals, including many women and children. The handling of the siege was widely criticized for its aggressive tactics and the loss of life. GOP opposition critics of President Clinton accused his leadership of complete, utter and criminal incompetence. Clinton apparently to busy forcing young women to give him a blow job. The GOP opposition condemned the Clinton government for grossly overstepped its authority and its utter and complete incompetence to negotiate effectively. The impeachment of Clinton served as a Parliamentary vote of No Confidence in the Government!

          The Ruby Ridge incident involved Randy Weaver, who was wanted for failing to appear in court on a firearms charge. A standoff occurred between Weaver’s family and federal agents, including the U.S. Marshals and the FBI, which escalated into violence, resulting in the deaths of Weaver’s wife, Vicki, and his son, Samuel. The federal government, under President George H.W. Bush, guilty of State War-crimes in his illegal invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and strongly suspected of justifying this imperialist nation building through the 9/11 inside job attack which resembles something like the Dec 7th Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

          But Cheney/Bush in their absolute and insane criminal arrogance did not approach Congress and ask for a Congressional Declaration of War. Instead these corrupt opportunistic war criminals passed their vile Patriot Act which negated the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution. Similar to Waco, the actions taken at Ruby Ridge were criticized for being excessive and poorly managed, leading to unnecessary loss of life.

          In both cases, there was significant public outcry and criticism of the government’s actions, but very few individuals faced legal consequences. Federal bureaucraps almost Universally operate without any accountability for their actions or regulatory laws they illegally impose upon the American people. This illegal forth branch of the US Government shares an incestuous relationship with Federally established Corporate monopolies. The latter has a revolving door incest/taboo relationship with Federal homo-bureaucraps.

          This illegal 4th Branch of the post Civil War Washington over-reach Government negates the Commerce Clause which relegates intra-state autonomy to the Legislatures of the States of the Union to bureaucratically regulate all intra-state trade & commerce, independent and free from Big Brother Federal carpet-bagger pervert bureaucraps overwatch. Post Civil War the Lincoln GOP dismantled the States authority to appoint Federal Senators to Congress through a Constitutional Amendment.

          The damned Yankees despise States Rights in favor of mob rule democracy. Hence Federal agents often operate under legal fiction protections that shield them from prosecution – when they act in the name of the State! This perversion of the Constitution set the stage wherein the incest revolving door Bureaucrap-Government established (Socialist) Corporate Monopolies function as a concealed Government which pulls the strings of the elected puppets of the 3 Branches of the Federal Government. Herein explains why it cost over a billion dollars to elect a US President to Office. The State established Federal corporate monopolies shape and determine the outcome of all “democratic” elections. These “elections” do not employ paper ballots!

          Investigations into the actions of federal agents invarably conclude that the use of bureaucrapic force – completely justified. Leading to a mafia like shielding – lack of criminal charges of politicians and bureaucraps; Obama can spy on candidate Trump with a fraud hoax Russia-Gate/Water-Gate, with complete and total impunity or risk. The Federal Government plays by a completely different set of rules than those imposed upon the peasant citizens\serf populations. Federal employees enjoy far more benefits than the bread crumbs thrown to the mob masses; the bankrupt social security by which the Federal government taxes the people does not apply to Federal employees and Congress personnel. The decision not to pursue charges against government officials based upon this illegal two-tiered corrupt legal system the direct result of the Lincoln rejection of Jeffersonian Democracy.

          The Oklahoma City bombing occurred on April 19, 1995, and was one of the deadliest acts of domestic terrorism in U.S. history. The attack was carried out by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, who sought to retaliate against the federal government, particularly in response to the Waco siege in 1993 and the Ruby Ridge incident in 1992. Civil War Santa Claus is coming to town.

          LikeLike

      24. Marco Rubio Sanctions ICC Judges After They Target U.S. and Israel in Explosive Rulings

          In a sweeping move, Senator Marco Rubio announced sanctions against four International Criminal Court justices.
          ________________________________________
          ________________________________________

          Marco Rubio’s sanctions on ICC judges—in response to politically driven rulings targeting the U.S. and Israel—represent the first serious American pushback against the expanding overreach of international legal institutions. But these sanctions merely scratch the surface. If Israel were to bomb the International Criminal Court in The Hague for the crime of judicial overreach, it would unleash a shockwave through the foundations of the post-WWII European imperial legal order.

          Such an act would shatter the illusion that the Rome Statute and its court represent binding global authority. In truth, the ICC is a political weapon wielded disproportionately against Western democracies and their allies, while shielding rogue regimes. Its authority rests on consensus, not enforcement. The Rome Treaty would be exposed as not worth the paper it’s written on.

          Europe forfeited its moral right to judge the Jewish people the moment it orchestrated the Shoah. Any European claim to universal justice—especially when applied selectively against the Jewish state—is hypocrisy cloaked in humanitarianism. The ICC’s rulings against Israel are not about war crimes; they are ritual acts of expiation for Europe’s own genocidal guilt. But that guilt is not Israel’s burden to carry. To bomb the ICC would be to formally reject Europe’s post-Nazi pretensions to legal supremacy and declare: “You have no right to judge us.”

          Bombing the ICC would have the same historical effect as the 1956 Suez Crisis: the end of European claims to independent geopolitical authority. Just as France and the UK’s failed bid to reclaim the Suez Canal revealed their imperial impotence, an Israeli destruction of the ICC would reveal the EU’s inability to project legal-moral power beyond its own borders.

          What the EU has is not law, but a narrative infrastructure—paper treaties, postmodern guilt, and international NGOs wielding legal language as a substitute for lost religious and imperial confidence.

          A targeted Israeli strike on the ICC would not trigger war. It would trigger disbelief, followed by narrative collapse, and finally a global reckoning with Western legal hypocrisy. The EU would be faced with the question: do we escalate to save face—or submit to an Israeli dictate which radically limits the EU authority in the balance of power in the Middle East and in Europe.

          If Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for the crime of judicial over-reach. This would set a precedent that the establishment of the ICC through the Rome Treaty – not worth the paper the Rome Treaty written upon. Widespread EU condemnations Big Deal. England and France have already broken off diplomatic relations with Israel.

          The Trump Government in Washington most likely would support Israel if Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for judicial over-reach. The Rome Treaty established Court would most likely dissolve. It would most definitely challenge the judicial jurisdiction of a European Court over Israel!

          Post Shoah Europe lost its rights to judge Jews. The destruction of the Pie in the Sky Rome Treaty would establish a major political precedent that European imperialism stops at the borders of the EU member states alone.

          The assertion that bombing the ICC in The Hague would lead to a collapse of the EU’s prestige is a strong viewpoint that reflects significant concerns about the authority and effectiveness of international institutions.

          If a member state or a country with significant geopolitical influence, like Israel, were to attack an international institution such as the ICC, it could be perceived as a direct challenge to the authority of not only the ICC but also the broader framework of international law that the EU supports.

          In short: bombing the Court of the Hague would radically change the balance of power in Europe. For the first time since the Muslim invasion of Western Europe a major disruption of European political autonomy would result.

          The EU would either put up or shut up: either they would declare War against Israel or not. The Nato alliance, if the US backed Israel would unquestionably collapse. The EU’s credibility as a defender of international law would cease to exist – gone like a puff of smoke. Israel would have called the bluff of the EU, like as if bombing the ICC compares to a hand of stud poker! This could lead to a more fragmented international order, challenging the EU’s role as a global actor.

          An attack on the ICC could set a precedent that undermines the enforcement of international law, leading to a situation where states feel empowered to act unilaterally without regard for international institutions.

          The incident could complicate diplomatic relations not only between Israel and the EU but also between other countries and international organizations. It could lead to a reevaluation of how states engage with international legal frameworks.

          The UN itself would most likely collapse like as did the League of Nations. If nothing else, the historical relationship between Europe and Israel, particularly in the context of the Shoah and post-war UN attempt to compare Israel to the European Nazi crimes against humanity, adds layers of complexity to this European projectionism of its own Nazi guilt and the moral bankruptcy of both Western and Eastern Roman church moral authority over European civilizations.

          The implications of such an act would resonate deeply within the historical narrative of European-Jewish relations and radically shift the narrative reversing the role of Jews as dominant and the church as dhimmi slaves – utterly rejected and despised.

          The entire European security architecture is underwritten by the United States, both financially and militarily. Without U.S. backing, NATO becomes functionally hollow. France and the UK retain nuclear capability, but their conventional power is insufficient to act independently against a U.S.-aligned state like Israel.

          No EU state would risk confrontation with the U.S., their most vital ally, over a non-NATO event like an Israeli action against the ICC. EU states are deeply post-military in culture. Their battlefield is law, narrative, and diplomacy—not armed force.

          Even in the face of Russian invasion (Ukraine), EU states have limited direct engagement, preferring economic sanctions, legal resolutions, and humanitarian aid. Against Israel, the EU’s instinct would be: denounce, sanction, isolate—not mobilize or fight.

          Much of EU condemnation of Israel is a projection of its own unresolved guilt over colonialism and the Holocaust. This moral outrage stops at the threshold of real cost. That’s why you see relentless UN resolutions, ICC motions, and media warfare—but not realpolitik confrontation. Israel calling their bluff—if the U.S. holds firm—exposes their impotence. If Israel bombed the ICC in the Hague – No War. No boots. No tanks. NO Article 5 Nato involvement. The collapse of Nato as an alliance.

          Symbolic institutions (like the ICC) to claim moral authority—but has no spine when force or geopolitical will counters that narrative. If Israel, backed by a U.S. administration, were to shatter a legal myth like the ICC’s authority … No war, but rather most likely the total collapse of EU imperialist Post WWII illusion of legal hegemony on par with England and France failure to capture and seize the Suez canal in the 1956 War. It would clearly reset the terms of European involvement in global legal power.

          LikeLike

2. Pingback: CIVILIZATION – REVIEWS AND VIEWS OF LIFE